Evidence · Randomised trial
High-Frequency Oscillation vs Mechanical Ventilation for Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Mechanical ventilation
- Medical
- Nursing
- PARDS
- Respiratory
Summary
Single-centre randomised trial comparing elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with continued conventional mechanical ventilation in 386 preterm infants (25-34 weeks' gestation) with neonatal ARDS who had first been stabilised on CMV. The primary outcome was bronchopulmonary dysplasia using two definitions, with secondary outcomes including death, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotising enterocolitis, intraventricular haemorrhage, air leak and haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. Elective HFOV was associated with a lower incidence of BPD, with no significant differences in the other outcomes. Of interest to PICU staff for the wider debate on HFOV versus conventional ventilation in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, though the population is neonatal.
Summary written for PICUlearn. Always read the original.
- Licence:
- Open (Creative Commons)
The full text of this openly licensed paper is available to PICUlearn members, and Peeky can answer questions from it.
Guidelines are shown for education. Follow your unit's own guidance and senior advice.